开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

cika · 2022年11月29日

请问A怎么理解,谢谢

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202206210100000106

问题如下:

Olivinia Heritage Case Scenario

Olivinia is an oil-rich state in the country of Puerto Rinaldo, which uses the US dollar as its official currency of exchange. In 1981, the state’s legislature created the Olivinia Heritage Fund (OHF) to collect a portion of the state’s non-renewable resource revenue and invest it on behalf of future generations. James Lafferty, the managing director of the fund, is one of the keynote speakers at the Global Wealth Creation Conference. He begins his presentation with a brief overview of OHF’s history (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1

An Overview of the Olivinia Heritage Fund
  • Phase 1 (1981–1991)

    The fund was given an initial allocation of $1 billion by the state. The fund was to receive 10% of all state revenues arising from taxes on oil and gas production and extraction. The fund was given a 20-year accumulation period over which no distributions were allowed and the fund was forecasted to grow to $10 billion. Income earned following the accumulation period was to be used to provide for public works and other public infrastructure within the state. Investments were restricted to cash and investment-grade bonds.

  • Phase 2 (1991–2001)

    By 1991, after being in existence for 10 years, the fund value had grown to $2.2 billion. At this time, transfers of state revenues from taxes on oil-related resources was halted and the government began to use income generated by the fund for direct economic development and social investment purposes. In addition to cash and investment-grade bonds, the investment mandate for the fund was expanded to include investments in private and public companies, real estate, and infrastructure investments. Management of cash and bond investments was performed in-house. For the higher-risk component of the portfolio, the fund hired external managers in an effort to increase return and correspondingly lower the incidence of negative performance. These managers were hired or retained if they had outperformed other active managers in their sectors in at least the prior two years. The fund value at the end of this period was $6 billion.

  • Phase 3 (2001–2014)

    Strong reform legislation related to the original intent of the fund was introduced in 2001. It reinstated transfers of oil-related taxes to the fund, increasing them to 35% of oil- and gas-related state revenues. In addition, the fund was mandated to have 50% in public equities through passive index funds and 10% in cash and investment-grade bonds. The remainder was to be divided equally between high-yield bonds, real estate, private equity, and hedge funds and would continue to be managed externally. All investments were to be made outside the country to avoid overheating the national economy. Investments managed by individual external managers was limited to approximately $75 million. A two-thirds majority in both the upper and lower legislative bodies was required to change any future legislation related to the fund. By the end of this phase, the fund was worth $28 billion.

  • Phase 4 (2014–Present)

    The fund’s management felt that the significant decline in oil prices since mid-2014 and lowered production levels were likely to persist through several business cycles, requiring a change in strategy to maintain the long-term objectives of the funds. They sought government approval for lower withdrawals from the fund, higher equity exposure, and the flexibility to vary asset class policy weights by as much ±5% for each asset class from the static weights that had previously existed. The government reaffirmed its commitment to the fund given in Phase 3, and legislative approval was received for these changes, including the ability to increase public equity exposure to 65% and reduce investment-grade bond exposure to as little as 7.5%. Of the remaining authorized assets, no one asset class could have a weight in excess of 10%.

Lafferty states that ever since the fund was given the authority to vary asset class policy weights from their strategic levels, it has actively engaged in tactical asset allocation (TAA) using a variety of proprietary short-term forecasting tools that have been developed in-house. He provides the data in Exhibits 2 and 3 to illustrate the results of one such shift in the fund’s asset allocation following a signal from its TAA model.

Exhibit 2

Example of a Short-Term Shift in Asset Allocation


* Current weight refers to the weighting in effect just prior to when the TAA signal occurred.

Lafferty concludes the morning portion of his presentation at the conference by comparing the relative performance of the three portfolios (from Exhibit 2) utilizing a graph (Exhibit 3) of the efficient frontier derived from the asset classes used by the fund.

Exhibit 3

Efficient Frontier from Assets Utilized by OHF

Exhibit 3

Question


The most appropriate conclusion that can be drawn from Exhibit 3 is that:

选项:

A.management’s risk–return objectives may not have been achieved with the TAA portfolio. B.the current portfolio is a corner portfolio. C.the Sharpe ratios for the policy portfolio and the TAA portfolio are the same.

解释:

Solution

A is correct. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line drawn from the risk-free rate to a particular portfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the policy portfolio and the TAA portfolio because both are indicated as being efficient. The diagram to the right indicates that the policy portfolio/risk-free combination has a higher slope than the TAA/risk-free combination. Even though the TAA portfolio has a higher return than the policy portfolio, the additional return requires too much additional risk. In addition, the TAA portfolio may exceed management’s risk tolerance.

B is incorrect. Corner portfolios are efficient portfolios and represent a portfolio where an asset weight changes from zero to positive or positive to zero. No such behavior in weights is indicated for the current portfolio allocation in Exhibit 2. It is also an inefficient portfolio.

C is incorrect. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line drawn from the risk-free rate to a particular portfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the policy portfolio and the TAA portfolio because both are indicated as being efficient. The diagram to the right indicates that the policy portfolio/risk-free combination has a higher slope than the TAA/risk-free combination.

请问A怎么理解,麻烦老师详细讲下,谢谢

1 个答案
已采纳答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2022年11月30日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


这道题其实是“看图说话”哈,首先TAA Portfolio 和Policy portfolio都是在efficient frontier上,所以斜率SR是一样的,sharp ratio一样只说明单位风险的收益一样。虽然单位风险的收益一样,但是Policy的收益低,风险也低,而TAA收益高,风险也高,那么从risk tolerance的角度来看,TAA可能不符合组合管理的要求,因此A选项正确,C选项错误。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 283

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ202206210100000106 问题如下 The most appropriate conclusion thcawn from Exhibit 3 is that: A.management’s risk–return objectives mnot have been achievewith the Tportfolio. B.the current portfolio is a corner portfolio. C.the Sharpe ratios for the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio are the same. SolutionA is correct. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. Even though the Tportfolio ha higher return ththe poliportfolio, the aitionreturn requires too muaitionrisk. In aition, the Tportfolio mexceemanagement’s risk tolerance.B is incorrect. Corner portfolios are efficient portfolios anrepresent a portfolio where asset weight changes from zero to positive or positive to zero. No subehavior in weights is incatefor the current portfolio allocation in Exhibit 2. It is also inefficient portfolio. C is incorrect. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. 看别的老师解析说虽然都有效,但是Policy的收益低,风险也低,而TAA收益高,风险也高,那么从risk tolerance的角度来看,TAA可能不符合组合管理的要求,因此A正确,C错误。也没明白为什么“从risk tolerance的角度来看,TAA可能不符合组合管理的要求?”请具体一下为什么不能选C,谢谢

2023-08-07 00:04 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206210100000106 问题如下 The most appropriate conclusion thcawn from Exhibit 3 is that: A.management’s risk–return objectives mnot have been achievewith the Tportfolio. B.the current portfolio is a corner portfolio. C.the Sharpe ratios for the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio are the same. SolutionA is correct. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. Even though the Tportfolio ha higher return ththe poliportfolio, the aitionreturn requires too muaitionrisk. In aition, the Tportfolio mexceemanagement’s risk tolerance.B is incorrect. Corner portfolios are efficient portfolios anrepresent a portfolio where asset weight changes from zero to positive or positive to zero. No subehavior in weights is incatefor the current portfolio allocation in Exhibit 2. It is also inefficient portfolio. C is incorrect. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. 1)所以是不是只要在efficient frontier上面的任意一个组合,都应该有着相同的sharpe ratio?2)但如果sharpe ratio代表的是Rf链接某一个有效前沿组合的斜率,那么应该会有千千万万个不同的sharpe ratio呀?有效前沿上越靠左边的组合理论上斜率就越高呀?

2023-07-10 07:53 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206210100000106问题如下The most appropriate conclusion thcawn from Exhibit 3 is that:A.management’s risk–return objectives mnot have been achievewith the Tportfolio.B.the current portfolio is a corner portfolio.C.the Sharpe ratios for the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio are the same. SolutionA is correct. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. Even though the Tportfolio ha higher return ththe poliportfolio, the aitionreturn requires too muaitionrisk. In aition, the Tportfolio mexceemanagement’s risk tolerance.B is incorrect. Corner portfolios are efficient portfolios anrepresent a portfolio where asset weight changes from zero to positive or positive to zero. No subehavior in weights is incatefor the current portfolio allocation in Exhibit 2. It is also inefficient portfolio. C is incorrect. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. poliportfolio 是啥意思

2023-06-29 13:18 3 · 回答

NO.PZ202206210100000106 问题如下 The most appropriate conclusion thcawn from Exhibit 3 is that: A.management’s risk–return objectives mnot have been achievewith the Tportfolio. B.the current portfolio is a corner portfolio. C.the Sharpe ratios for the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio are the same. SolutionA is correct. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. Even though the Tportfolio ha higher return ththe poliportfolio, the aitionreturn requires too muaitionrisk. In aition, the Tportfolio mexceemanagement’s risk tolerance.B is incorrect. Corner portfolios are efficient portfolios anrepresent a portfolio where asset weight changes from zero to positive or positive to zero. No subehavior in weights is incatefor the current portfolio allocation in Exhibit 2. It is also inefficient portfolio. C is incorrect. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. 如题

2023-06-18 15:04 1 · 回答

NO.PZ202206210100000106 问题如下 The most appropriate conclusion thcawn from Exhibit 3 is that: A.management’s risk–return objectives mnot have been achievewith the Tportfolio. B.the current portfolio is a corner portfolio. C.the Sharpe ratios for the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio are the same. SolutionA is correct. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. Even though the Tportfolio ha higher return ththe poliportfolio, the aitionreturn requires too muaitionrisk. In aition, the Tportfolio mexceemanagement’s risk tolerance.B is incorrect. Corner portfolios are efficient portfolios anrepresent a portfolio where asset weight changes from zero to positive or positive to zero. No subehavior in weights is incatefor the current portfolio allocation in Exhibit 2. It is also inefficient portfolio. C is incorrect. The Sharpe ratio is the slope of the line awn from the risk-free rate to a particulportfolio. The two portfolios of interest are the poliportfolio anthe Tportfolio because both are incatebeing efficient. The agrto the right incates ththe poliportfolio/risk-free combination ha higher slope ththe TAA/risk-free combination. 老师您好,请问Sharpe Ratio是看连接Rf和Efficient frontier上点的斜率还是看连接原点和Efficient frontier上点的斜率(后者也就是自身斜率)?我看过助教的答案写的是“首先TPortfolio 和Poliportfolio都是在efficient frontier上,所以斜率SR是一样的,sharp ratio一样只说明单位风险的收益一样。”但是很明显无论是连接Rf和Efficient frontier上点的斜率还是看连接原点和Efficient frontier上点的斜率,都是Poliportfolio的斜率更高啊。

2023-04-20 17:40 1 · 回答