开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

鹏鹏 · 2023年12月14日

UCITS 能帮忙解释下这个是什么产品啊?有什么特点?

NO.PZ2021060201000024

问题如下:

Johnson is Zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company), their return targets are moderate. Therefore,two key investment considerations for zhou are keeping low overhead costs and minimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou has been reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson discusses with zhou its goal of diversifying the company’s portfolio to include alternative assets. And the portfolio is meeting the company’s liquidity needs. Johnson proposes the following three investment vehicles for further review:

· Funds of funds (FOFs)

· Separately managed accounts (SMAs)

· Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS)

Determine the investment vehicle that best fits the alternative asset class proposed by the company. Justify your response.

选项:

解释:

• An FOF would allow the company to co-invest with other investors in alternative investment opportunities for which the company might otherwise be too small to participate.

• An in-house team would not be necessary to review and maintain an FOF, which uses an outside manager.

• The company is unlikely to meet the very high minimum investment of an SMA, which may also require enhanced in-house investment resources.

• The company does not need the higher liquidity of UCITS, which have a less attractive risk/return profile for the company’s relatively small-sized portfolio. An FOF is the most appropriate investment

FOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。

• FOF 将允许公司与其他投资者共同投资另类投资机会,否则the company可能因规模太小而无法参与。

• 不需要内部团队来审查和维护使用外部经理的 FOF。

• the company不太可能满足 SMA 的非常高的最低投资要求,这也可能需要更多的内部投资资源。

• the company不需要UCITS 更高的流动性,UCITS 对于the company规模相对较小的投资组合而言,风险/回报的吸引力较低。

FOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。该工具允许the company 与其他投资者共同投资,以参与其他投资机会,否则其规模太小而无法参与。由于该投资工具使用外部经理,因此不需要内部专家团队(in-house team)来审查和维护 FOF 的投资类型。

SMA 可用于某些大型投资组合,例如大型家族办公室或基金会的投资组合,但 the company 不太可能满足非常高的最低投资要求。这种类型的投资给投资者带来了更大的运营挑战;因此,SMA 可能需要更多的内部投资资源。 UCITS 不太适合 the company,因为the company是中型(而非小型)投资者,其流动性需求正在得到满足。 the company 应该投资于流动性较低、风险/回报更具吸引力的工具。此外,UCITS 有监管限制,使基金经理更难实施所需的投资策略。



 UCITS 能帮忙解释下这个是什么产品啊?有什么特点?

1 个答案

伯恩_品职助教 · 2023年12月14日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


UCITS是欧盟可转让证券集合投资计划 (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) 的简称

UCITS基金类似于美国的共同基金,它们在属于欧盟的国家注册,并受注册地成员国监管。欧盟委员会定期发布指导意见,供成员监管机构遵循。欧盟相关法案明确允许UCITS基金可以使用金融衍生品工具[iii]。


UCITS基金运用衍生品后的实证分析


UCITS基金已经允许使用衍生品多年,衍生品在UCITS基金投资管理中的影响十分值得我们关注和借鉴。欧洲证券和市场管理局在2019年发布了一份相关报告,相关研究人员利用EMIR监管框架下收集的UCITS基金开展场外衍生品数据,对欧盟UCITS股票基金使用衍生品情况进行分析研究[iv],研究结果表明:(1)基金在管理中使用衍生品,可以减少跟踪误差;(2)使用衍生品可以节省交易成本;(3)权益基金可以使用衍生品来管理其货币持仓风险。


监管要求


UCITS基金可以投资的衍生品合约,包括挂钩欧盟成员国可转让的证券、货币市场工具、第三国交易所市场的证券等的衍生品,但是要求满足以下要求(详见Article 50):


(1)挂钩的底层资产,包括指数、利率、外汇、货币等,应该属于UCITS基金本身根据其投资计划合同中可以投资的品种;


(2)场外衍生品的交易对手属于受到审慎监管的机构,且被当地监管机构认定为有资质的机构;


(3)场外衍生品应该有可信赖、可测量的每日估值,并且可以在任何时候,以公允的价格通过背对背交易进行卖出或是了结、提前终止。


此外,欧盟要求UCITS基金内部有一套能够准确、独立评估场外衍生品的机制,UCITS基金应该和其注册所在国家的监管机构进行沟通汇报,报告的内容包括衍生品工具的类型、底层资产的风险,以及为评估相关衍生品交易相关风险所选择的量化限额及方法。



这个同学了解一下就行。

在CFA三级另类学科下面只要知道UCITS是一个中小投资者就可以参与的基金,这个基金可以投资传统基金不能投资的衍生品、另类投资,相当于是给了中小投资者投资另类产品的机会。然后会受到政府的监管,管理比合伙制的资管要严格

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 120

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2021060201000024 问题如下 Johnson is Zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company), their return targets are morate. Therefore,two key investment consirations for zhou are keeping low overhecosts anminimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou hbeen reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson scusses with zhou its goof versifying the company’s portfolio to inclu alternative assets. Anthe portfolio is meeting the company’s liquity nee. Johnson proposes the following three investment vehicles for further review:· Fun of fun (FOFs)· Separately manageaccounts (SMAs)· Unrtakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) termine the investment vehicle thbest fits the alternative asset class proposethe company. Justify your response. • FOF woulallow the company to co-invest with other investors in alternative investment opportunities for whithe company might otherwise too small to participate.• in-house tewoulnot necessary to review anmaintain FOF, whiuses outsi manager.• The company is unlikely to meet the very high minimum investment of SMwhimalso require enhancein-house investment resources.• The company es not neethe higher liquity of UCITS, whihave a less attractive risk/return profile for the company’s relatively small-sizeportfolio. FOF is the most appropriate investmentFOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。• FOF 将允许公司与其他投资者共同投资另类投资机会,否则the company可能因规模太小而无法参与。• 不需要内部团队来审查和维护使用外部经理的 FOF。• the company不太可能满足 SMA 的非常高的最低投资要求,这也可能需要更多的内部投资资源。• the company不需要UCITS 更高的流动性,UCITS 对于the company规模相对较小的投资组合而言,风险/回报的吸引力较低。FOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。该工具允许the company 与其他投资者共同投资,以参与其他投资机会,否则其规模太小而无法参与。由于该投资工具使用外部经理,因此不需要内部专家团队(in-house team)来审查和维护 FOF 的投资类型。SMA 可用于某些大型投资组合,例如大型家族办公室或基金会的投资组合,但 the company 不太可能满足非常高的最低投资要求。这种类型的投资给投资者带来了更大的运营挑战;因此,SMA 可能需要更多的内部投资资源。 UCITS 不太适合 the company,因为the company是中型(而非小型)投资者,其流动性需求正在得到满足。 the company 应该投资于流动性较低、风险/回报更具吸引力的工具。此外,UCITS 有监管限制,使基金经理更难实施所需的投资策略。 需要记UCITs的特点吗

2024-04-08 05:08 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021060201000024 问题如下 Johnson is Zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company), their return targets are morate. Therefore,two key investment consirations for zhou are keeping low overhecosts anminimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou hbeen reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson scusses with zhou its goof versifying the company’s portfolio to inclu alternative assets. Anthe portfolio is meeting the company’s liquity nee. Johnson proposes the following three investment vehicles for further review:· Fun of fun (FOFs)· Separately manageaccounts (SMAs)· Unrtakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) termine the investment vehicle thbest fits the alternative asset class proposethe company. Justify your response. • FOF woulallow the company to co-invest with other investors in alternative investment opportunities for whithe company might otherwise too small to participate.• in-house tewoulnot necessary to review anmaintain FOF, whiuses outsi manager.• The company is unlikely to meet the very high minimum investment of SMwhimalso require enhancein-house investment resources.• The company es not neethe higher liquity of UCITS, whihave a less attractive risk/return profile for the company’s relatively small-sizeportfolio. FOF is the most appropriate investmentFOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。• FOF 将允许公司与其他投资者共同投资另类投资机会,否则the company可能因规模太小而无法参与。• 不需要内部团队来审查和维护使用外部经理的 FOF。• the company不太可能满足 SMA 的非常高的最低投资要求,这也可能需要更多的内部投资资源。• the company不需要UCITS 更高的流动性,UCITS 对于the company规模相对较小的投资组合而言,风险/回报的吸引力较低。FOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。该工具允许the company 与其他投资者共同投资,以参与其他投资机会,否则其规模太小而无法参与。由于该投资工具使用外部经理,因此不需要内部专家团队(in-house team)来审查和维护 FOF 的投资类型。SMA 可用于某些大型投资组合,例如大型家族办公室或基金会的投资组合,但 the company 不太可能满足非常高的最低投资要求。这种类型的投资给投资者带来了更大的运营挑战;因此,SMA 可能需要更多的内部投资资源。 UCITS 不太适合 the company,因为the company是中型(而非小型)投资者,其流动性需求正在得到满足。 the company 应该投资于流动性较低、风险/回报更具吸引力的工具。此外,UCITS 有监管限制,使基金经理更难实施所需的投资策略。 FOF是否满足最小化TAX的要求?

2023-10-18 10:27 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021060201000024 问题如下 Johnson is Zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company), their return targets are morate. Therefore,two key investment consirations for zhou are keeping low overhecosts anminimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou hbeen reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson scusses with zhou its goof versifying the company’s portfolio to inclu alternative assets. Anthe portfolio is meeting the company’s liquity nee. Johnson proposes the following three investment vehicles for further review:· Fun of fun (FOFs)· Separately manageaccounts (SMAs)· Unrtakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) termine the investment vehicle thbest fits the alternative asset class proposethe company. Justify your response. • FOF woulallow the company to co-invest with other investors in alternative investment opportunities for whithe company might otherwise too small to participate.• in-house tewoulnot necessary to review anmaintain FOF, whiuses outsi manager.• The company is unlikely to meet the very high minimum investment of SMwhimalso require enhancein-house investment resources.• The company es not neethe higher liquity of UCITS, whihave a less attractive risk/return profile for the company’s relatively small-sizeportfolio. FOF is the most appropriate investmentFOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。• FOF 将允许公司与其他投资者共同投资另类投资机会,否则the company可能因规模太小而无法参与。• 不需要内部团队来审查和维护使用外部经理的 FOF。• the company不太可能满足 SMA 的非常高的最低投资要求,这也可能需要更多的内部投资资源。• the company不需要UCITS 更高的流动性,UCITS 对于the company规模相对较小的投资组合而言,风险/回报的吸引力较低。FOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。该工具允许the company 与其他投资者共同投资,以参与其他投资机会,否则其规模太小而无法参与。由于该投资工具使用外部经理,因此不需要内部专家团队(in-house team)来审查和维护 FOF 的投资类型。SMA 可用于某些大型投资组合,例如大型家族办公室或基金会的投资组合,但 the company 不太可能满足非常高的最低投资要求。这种类型的投资给投资者带来了更大的运营挑战;因此,SMA 可能需要更多的内部投资资源。 UCITS 不太适合 the company,因为the company是中型(而非小型)投资者,其流动性需求正在得到满足。 the company 应该投资于流动性较低、风险/回报更具吸引力的工具。此外,UCITS 有监管限制,使基金经理更难实施所需的投资策略。 我一看见low overhecost的要求,我就把FoF给排除了。。毕竟,FoF不是fee structure吗?要被收两笔费1-10和2-20各一?是我理解有啥问题吗0.0多谢!~

2022-12-13 22:13 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021060201000024 问题如下 Johnson is Zhou's investment consultant, a relatively small investment manager company(the company), their return targets are morate. Therefore,two key investment consirations for zhou are keeping low overhecosts anminimizing taxes in the portfolio. Zhou hbeen reluctant to incur the costs of in-house investment resources.Johnson scusses with zhou its goof versifying the company’s portfolio to inclu alternative assets. Anthe portfolio is meeting the company’s liquity nee. Johnson proposes the following three investment vehicles for further review:· Fun of fun (FOFs)· Separately manageaccounts (SMAs)· Unrtakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) termine the investment vehicle thbest fits the alternative asset class proposethe company. Justify your response. • FOF woulallow the company to co-invest with other investors in alternative investment opportunities for whithe company might otherwise too small to participate.• in-house tewoulnot necessary to review anmaintain FOF, whiuses outsi manager.• The company is unlikely to meet the very high minimum investment of SMwhimalso require enhancein-house investment resources.• The company es not neethe higher liquity of UCITS, whihave a less attractive risk/return profile for the company’s relatively small-sizeportfolio. FOF is the most appropriate investmentFOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。• FOF 将允许公司与其他投资者共同投资另类投资机会,否则the company可能因规模太小而无法参与。• 不需要内部团队来审查和维护使用外部经理的 FOF。• the company不太可能满足 SMA 的非常高的最低投资要求,这也可能需要更多的内部投资资源。• the company不需要UCITS 更高的流动性,UCITS 对于the company规模相对较小的投资组合而言,风险/回报的吸引力较低。FOF 是 the company 最合适的投资工具。该工具允许the company 与其他投资者共同投资,以参与其他投资机会,否则其规模太小而无法参与。由于该投资工具使用外部经理,因此不需要内部专家团队(in-house team)来审查和维护 FOF 的投资类型。SMA 可用于某些大型投资组合,例如大型家族办公室或基金会的投资组合,但 the company 不太可能满足非常高的最低投资要求。这种类型的投资给投资者带来了更大的运营挑战;因此,SMA 可能需要更多的内部投资资源。 UCITS 不太适合 the company,因为the company是中型(而非小型)投资者,其流动性需求正在得到满足。 the company 应该投资于流动性较低、风险/回报更具吸引力的工具。此外,UCITS 有监管限制,使基金经理更难实施所需的投资策略。 考虑low overhecost的话 为什么选FOF FOF有两层fee 因为要lower cost 所以我认为不能选而且这个company不是relatively small吗 为什么里面说是中等的综上难道不是选UTIS更合适吗

2022-09-01 22:58 1 · 回答