开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

cika · 2024年01月23日

Note 2

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201809170400000106

问题如下:

Which of the following notes about the DoGood Fund is correct?

选项:

A.

Only Note 2

B.

Only Note 3

C.

Both Note 2 and Note 3

解释:

B is correct because the fund becomes a free-rider if it allows other shareholders to engage in actions that benefit the fund, and therefore Note 3 is correct. In theory, some investors could benefit from the shareholder engagement of others under the so-called "free rider problem." Specifically, assume that a portfolio manager using an active strategy actively engages with a company to improve its operations and was successful in increasing the company’s stock price. The manager’s actions in this case improved the value of his portfolio and also benefitted other investors that own the same stock in their portfolios. Those investors that did not participate in shareholder engagement benefit from improved performance but without the costs necessary for engagement.

Note 2 is incorrect because a conflict of interest arises on the part of the DoGood Fund if it owns shares of a company that invests in the fund. Conflicts of interest can result for a company. For example, a portfolio manager could engage with a company that also happens to be an investor in the manager’s portfolio. In such a situation, a portfolio manager may be unduly influenced to support the company’s management so as not to jeopardize the company’s investment mandate with the portfolio manager.

老师,请问Note 2中,是不是双方都会受到利益冲突

1 个答案
已采纳答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年01月24日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


老师,请问Note 2中,是不是双方都会受到利益冲突

Hello,亲爱的同学~

同学这里理解正确。

双方都有利益冲突。

因此,Note2里的but not for the DoGood fund,这个阐述不正确。

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 61

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201809170400000106 Only Note 3 Both Note 2 anNote 3 B is correbecause the funbecomes a free-rir if it allows other shareholrs to engage in actions thbenefit the fun antherefore Note 3 is correct. In theory, some investors coulbenefit from the shareholr engagement of others unr the so-calle\"free rir problem.\" Specifically, assume tha portfolio manager using active strategy actively engages with a company to improve its operations anwsuccessful in increasing the company’s stoprice. The manager’s actions in this case improvethe value of his portfolio analso benefitteother investors thown the same stoin their portfolios. Those investors thnot participate in shareholr engagement benefit from improveperformanbut without the costs necessary for engagement. Note 2 is incorrebecause a confliof interest arises on the part of the GooFunif it owns shares of a company thinvests in the fun Conflicts of interest cresult for a company. For example, a portfolio manager coulengage with a company thalso happens to investor in the manager’s portfolio. In sua situation, a portfolio manager munly influenceto support the company’s management so not to jeoparze the company’s investment mante with the portfolio manager. .能一下note2讲什么吗 没看懂意思

2022-01-04 17:31 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000106 Only Note 3 Both Note 2 anNote 3 B is correbecause the funbecomes a free-rir if it allows other shareholrs to engage in actions thbenefit the fun antherefore Note 3 is correct. In theory, some investors coulbenefit from the shareholr engagement of others unr the so-calle\"free rir problem.\" Specifically, assume tha portfolio manager using active strategy actively engages with a company to improve its operations anwsuccessful in increasing the company’s stoprice. The manager’s actions in this case improvethe value of his portfolio analso benefitteother investors thown the same stoin their portfolios. Those investors thnot participate in shareholr engagement benefit from improveperformanbut without the costs necessary for engagement. Note 2 is incorrebecause a confliof interest arises on the part of the GooFunif it owns shares of a company thinvests in the fun Conflicts of interest cresult for a company. For example, a portfolio manager coulengage with a company thalso happens to investor in the manager’s portfolio. In sua situation, a portfolio manager munly influenceto support the company’s management so not to jeoparze the company’s investment mante with the portfolio manager. goofun投资了这家公司的股票,这家公司的pension又把钱给 fun理,这样两家 fun这家公司都应该有利益冲突,是吗?

2021-07-31 01:34 3 · 回答

Only Note 3 Both Note 2 anNote 3 B is correbecause the funbecomes a free-rir if it allows other shareholrs to engage in actions thbenefit the fun antherefore Note 3 is correct. In theory, some investors coulbenefit from the shareholr engagement of others unr the so-calle\"free rir problem.\" Specifically, assume tha portfolio manager using active strategy actively engages with a company to improve its operations anwsuccessful in increasing the company’s stoprice. The manager’s actions in this case improvethe value of his portfolio analso benefitteother investors thown the same stoin their portfolios. Those investors thnot participate in shareholr engagement benefit from improveperformanbut without the costs necessary for engagement. Note 2 is incorrebecause a confliof interest arises on the part of the GooFunif it owns shares of a company thinvests in the fun Conflicts of interest cresult for a company. For example, a portfolio manager coulengage with a company thalso happens to investor in the manager’s portfolio. In sua situation, a portfolio manager munly influenceto support the company’s management so not to jeoparze the company’s investment mante with the portfolio manager. 抱歉请问可以帮助我理解一下note 3吗?Note3是说goo参与shareholr activism,因此,goo能会有free-rir的现象。free-rir是指有的股东主动参与经营时,其他不出力,但是可以坐享其成。可是,如果没有activism,free-rir也就不存在了呀,为什么会有free- rir存在?谢谢!

2020-11-08 21:01 1 · 回答

    这题怎么理解confliof interest?金投资了F公司股票,而F公司的Pension投资了金,怎么就对金带来利益冲突了?是因为F公司的Pension会左右金的投资决策吗?

2019-04-01 22:17 4 · 回答