NO.PZ201604030300004306
问题如下:
6. Are the seminar speaker’s Statements 3 and 4, respectively, sufficient to meet the requirements of related CFA Institute Standards?
选项:
解释:
B is correct.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The disclosure of a conflict should be made prominently and in plain languageregardless of whether the member views the conflict as material, so the client can determine the materiality of the conflict. Statement 4 is in compliance with CFA Institute Standards. The Mahsud Financial disclosure requirement meets CFA Institute Standards. Gifts from clients should be disclosed to the employer, which is responsible for determining whether the gift could affect the employee’s independence and objectivity.
我想做个对比,
这道题和 No.PZ2016040303000042 - Elias Nano那个case的第六题-
题干:
4. Violations
Any violation of the Markoe Advisors compliance policy statement will be reported to the president, and employees will receive an official warning.
5. Compensation
All staff members of Markoe Advisors will discuss with their supervisor all outside compensation that they are receiving or may receive.
question:Does Nano’s draft compliance policy statement conform to the CFA Institute Code and Standards with respect to: violation & compensation?
我想请问这两道题主要的区别就是题干描述不同,一个说的是discuss 另一个说的是disclose?但是都没有提及written permission。 但是Elias Nano case里compensation的描述是错误的答案解释是没有说written permission。 同样这道题也没有提及written permission为什么就是对的?