开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Ironlung · 2024年01月23日

选项A

NO.PZ2019012201000079

问题如下:

Which of following is correct regarding on Implementation Constraints?

选项:

A.

Twice the absolute risk will lead to twice the return.

B.

Markowitz efficient frontier shows that the relationship between return and risk is convex.

C.

There is a level of leverage beyond which volatility reduces expected returns.

解释:

C is corrent. Portfolios may face implementation constraints that decrease the IR if active risk increases beyond a specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets face limited diversification opportunities, which may lead to a decrease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyond which volatility reduces expected returns.

主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。

There may be constraints that prevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twice the absolute risk will not lead to twice the return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows that the relationship between return and risk is concave.

选项A麻烦解释一下

1 个答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年01月24日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


选项A麻烦解释一下


Hello,亲爱的同学~

这里有一个知识点:因为存在 Implementation Constraints,例如限制做空,流动性不足等限制,因此,当扩大风险的时候,收益并不会同比例的扩大。


在这个知识点的基础上,我们再看本题。

本题的A选项,两倍的风险,会带来两倍的收益,这是不对的。

因为有一些限制,比如原先的策略有做空,那么2倍风险,仓位扩大一倍后,并没有那么多的股票可供做空,因此,这个时候,虽然风险扩大了2倍,但是收益不一定是2倍,收益可能只有1.5倍,或者更少。





----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 75

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 马科维茨是个CONVX关系啊?

2024-03-31 22:28 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. the relationship between return anrisk is concave如何理解这句话呢?

2024-01-27 17:53 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 如题,B为什么错,有效前沿不是凸的嘛

2024-01-26 10:30 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019012201000079 问题如下 Whiof following is correregarng on Implementation Constraints? A.Twithe absolute risk will leto twithe return. B.Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is convex. C.There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. C is corrent. Portfolios mfaimplementation constraints thcrease the IR if active risk increases beyona specific level; Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities, whimleto a crease in the SR. There is a level of leverage beyonwhivolatility reces expectereturns. 主要是说当杠杆过高,虽然可能会带来收益,但是风险也会增加,带来更大的波动,反而会降低收益。打个比方,昨天跌了10%,今天涨了10%,看起来好像是一样的。但是实际不是一回事,反而是亏损的(亏损1%),加杠杆后会进一步降低收益。There mconstraints thprevent Manager A from scaling his active weights.So twithe absolute risk will not leto twithe return, Markowitz efficient frontier shows ththe relationship between return anrisk is concave. 老师可以一下为什么 Portfolios with high absolute risk targets falimiteversification opportunities? 为什么high absolute risk targets, 投资更加集中化?

2024-01-22 21:27 1 · 回答