开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

yx9881 · 2019年12月02日

问一道题:NO.PZ2019103001000064

问题如下:

Susan Winslow manages bond funds denominated in US Dollars, Euros, and British Pounds. Each fund invests in sovereign bonds and related derivatives. Each fund can invest a portion of its assets outside its base currency market with or without hedging the currency exposure, but to date Winslow has not utilized this capacity. She believes she can also hedge bonds into currencies other than a portfolio’s base currency when she expects doing so will add value. However, the legal department has not yet confirmed this interpretation. If the lawyers disagree, Winslow will be limited to either unhedged positions or hedging into each portfolio’s base currency.

Winslow thinks the Mexican and Greek markets may offer attractive opportunities to enhance returns. Yields in these markets are given in Exhibit 1, along with those for the base currencies of her portfolios. The Greek rates are for euro-denominated government bonds priced at par. In the other markets, the yields apply to par sovereign bonds as well as to the fixed side of swaps versus six-month Libor (i.e., swap spreads are zero in each market). The six-month Libor rates also represent the rates at which investors can borrow or lend in each currency. Winslow observes that the five-year Treasury-note and the five-year German government note are the cheapest to deliver against their respective futures contracts expiring in six months.

Winslow expects yields in the US, Euro, UK, and Greek markets to remain stable over the next six months. She expects Mexican yields to decline to 7.0% at all maturities. Meanwhile, she projects that the Mexican Peso will depreciate by 2% against the Euro, the US Dollar will depreciate by 1% against the Euro, and the British Pound will remain stable versus the Euro. Winslow believes bonds of the same maturity may be viewed as having the same duration for purposes of identifying the most attractive positions.

Based on these views, Winslow is considering three types of trades. First, she is looking at carry trades, with or without taking currency exposure, among her three base currency markets. Each such trade will involve extending duration (e.g., lend long/borrow short) in no more than one market. Second, assuming the legal department confirms her interpretation of permissible currency hedging, she wants to identify the most attractive five-year bond and currency exposure for each of her three portfolios from among the five markets shown in Exhibit 1. Third, she wants to identify the most attractive five-year bond and hedging decision for each portfolio if she is only allowed to hedge into the portfolio’s base currency.

If Winslow is allowed to hedge into any of the currencies, she can obtain the highest expected returns by

选项:

A.

buying the Greek 5-year in each portfolio and hedging it into Pesos

B.

buying the Greek 5-year in each portfolio and hedging it into USD.

C.

buying the Mexican 5-year in each portfolio and not hedging the currency

解释:

A is correct.

As shown in the previous question, the Greek bond is the most attractive. Although the Peso is expected to depreciate by 2% against the EUR and the GBP and by 1% against the USD, this is less than the benefit of hedging EUR into MXN (+3.475%). The net currency component of the expected return is +1.475% = (3.475% – 2.0%) for the EUR and GBP portfolios and +2.475% = (3.475% – 1.0%) for the USD-denominated portfolio. Hedging into GBP would add only 0.175% for any of the portfolios. Hedging into USD would reduce expected return for any of the portfolios because the pick up on the hedge (+0.625%) is less than the expected depreciation (–1.0%) of the USD against the Euro and GBP.

B is incorrect. Hedging the Euro-denominated Greek bond into USD would reduce expected return for any of the portfolios because the pick on the hedge (+0.625%) is less than the expected depreciation of the USD against the Euro and GBP.

C is incorrect. As shown above, the Greek bond is more attractive than the Mexican bond.

1. 可以再补充些解答信息吗?

按照视频,何旋老师的讲解思路: 如果hedge, EUR hedge into MXN, 则 R(fx) = R(MXN) -R(EUR), 这个数值要比 


R(USD) -R(EUR), 所以选择A.

这个思路和这道题的解答思路不一致?


2. 这部分的解答没看明白

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


同理,对于USD账户,最终核算的收益为USD,所以将希腊债的EUR收益Hedge成了MXN之后,还需要将MXN收益再用未来预期的即期汇率换回USD;

因为预测MXN相对USD贬值1%,所以先把希腊债的EUR收益Hedge成MXN收益,再按即期汇率将MXN收益换回USD收益,获得的净收益为:

3.475%-1%=2.475%;

也就是不考虑债券投资,对USD账户,先把EUR收益用Forward hedge成MXN,再用预期的未来即期汇率将MXN收益换回USD收益,就额外增加了2.475%的收益。

如果不进行这步操作,对于USD账户,预期EUR相对USD升值1%,把希腊债EUR收益换回USD的收益仅仅为1%。

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2.475% 大于 3.475% - 2% = 1.475%;那不是该选B了吗?

1 个答案

发亮_品职助教 · 2019年12月03日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


“按照视频,何旋老师的讲解思路:  如果hedge, EUR hedge into  MXN,  则 R(fx) = R(MXN)  -R(EUR),  这个数值要比 

R(USD)  -R(EUR), 所以选择A.

这个思路和这道题的解答思路不一致?”


思路是一样的,何老师这个步骤是在选择Hedge成哪种货币Forward带来的收益最大。

我们可以将EUR的收益Hedge成任意货币,所以第一步就是确定Hedge成哪种货币。

EUR into MXN,用Forward hedge带来的收益为:(7.10%-0.15%)/2=3.475%

EUR into USD,用Forward hedge带来的收益为:(1.40%-0.15%)/2=0.625%

EUR into GBP,用Forward hedge带来的收益为:(0.50%-0.15%)/2=0.175%

所以这步的比较发现:将EUR收益Hedge成MXN,Forward带来的收益最大,我们给所有的Portfolio都选择Hedge成MXN。到这步就已经可以选出答案A了。

至于那道题说的最后还要按即期汇率换成本币,是因为这道题的解析算了净收益,所以按照解析延伸了下。



“2.475% 大于 3.475% - 2% = 1.475%;那不是该选B了吗?”


1.475%的收益,是对于GBP/EUR账户而言的净收益。

我们给所有的账户:USD账户、GBP账户、EUR账户,都先把希腊债的EUR收益Hedge成了MXN,Forward带来的收益是3.475%;

但是对于不同的账户,最总核算还是用Base currency,所以最终还需要算回本币。这时候就要用Forward的收益减去预期Base Currency的升贬值,来算净收益。

例如,对于GBP/EUR账户,预期MXN相对于GBP/EUR贬值2%,所以对于这两个账户来说,经过Hedge成MXN、再换回本币这步操作后的净收益为:3.475%-2%=1.475%

而对于USD账户,预期MXN相对于USD贬值1%,经过Hedge成MXN、再换回本币这步操作后的净收益为:3.475%-1%=2.475%


B选项说的是把所以账户的EUR收益Hedge成USD。

由前面计算可知,Hedge成USD,Forward带来的收益为:0.625%,这个收益远远小于Hedge成MXN Forward带来的收益3.475%,所以不选B。

如果Hedge成USD,对于GBP/EUR的账户来说,净收益为:0.625%-2%=-1.375%;因为最终核算GBP/EUR账户收益时,还需要用本币,但是USD相对EUR/GBP贬值2%,所以经过Hedge成UDS、再换回本币后的净收益是0.625%-2%=-1.375%,显然将GBP/EUR账户的收益Hedge成USD是不利的。


-------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!


  • 1

    回答
  • 7

    关注
  • 355

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2019103001000064 老师,这道题的解题思路能用中文解答一遍么?

2021-09-03 21:28 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000064 这里的hee为什么用的是6个月的,而不是5年的利率?毕竟这里是买5年的债券啊

2021-06-10 14:03 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000064  the benefit of heing EUR into MXN (+3.475%).是怎样计算得来的?

2021-05-06 19:00 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2019103001000064 3.475%是怎么来的?还有其他的?完全没看懂答案,麻烦老师解答下。

2021-04-15 19:10 1 · 回答

buying the Greek 5-yein eaportfolio anheing it into US buying the Mexic5-yein eaportfolio annot heing the curren A is correct. shown in the previous question, the Greek bonis the most attractive. Although the Peso is expecteto preciate 2% against the EUR anthe Gan1% against the US this is less ththe benefit of heing EUR into MXN (+3.475%). The net currencomponent of the expectereturn is +1.475% = (3.475% – 2.0%) for the EUR anGportfolios an+2.475% = (3.475% – 1.0%) for the USnominateportfolio. Heing into Gwoula only 0.175% for any of the portfolios. Heing into USwoulreexpectereturn for any of the portfolios because the piup on the hee (+0.625%) is less ththe expectepreciation (–1.0%) of the USagainst the Euro anGBP. B is incorrect. Heing the Euro-nominateGreek boninto USwoulreexpectereturn for any of the portfolios because the pion the hee (+0.625%) is less ththe expectepreciation of the USagainst the Euro anGBP. C is incorrect. shown above, the Greek bonis more attractive ththe Mexicbon这题的第一步为什么是3.475%呢?为什么不用5年期Greek bon利率来算要用euro的floating rate来算呢?从计算过程来看感觉跟Greek bon啥关系啊这题

2020-11-02 08:29 1 · 回答