开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

EvanWu · 2021年09月15日

能解释一下statement1吗

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201809170400000201

问题如下:

Which of Tong’s statements regarding equity index benchmarks is (are) correct?

选项:

A.

Only Statement 1

B.

Only Statement 2

C.

Both Statement 1 and Statement 2

解释:

B is correct. The three requirements for an index to become the basis for an equity investment strategy are that the index be (a) rules based, (b) transparent, and (c) investable. Buffering makes index benchmarks more investable (Statement 2) by making index transitions a more gradual and orderly process.

A is incorrect because basing the index weight of an individual security solely on the total number of shares outstanding without using a free-float adjustment may make the index less investable. If a stock market cap excludes shares held by founders, governments, or other companies, then the remaining shares more accurately reflect the stock’s true liquidity. Thus a free-float adjustment (Statement 1) to a market index more accurately reflects its actual liquidity (it does not lower its liquidity). Many indexes require that individual stocks have float and average shares traded above a certain percentage of shares outstanding.

能解释一下statement1吗

1 个答案
已采纳答案

伯恩_品职助教 · 2021年09月15日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


statement1 是说现在一个index里比如只有一个股票吧,中石油,表面上看好像500亿的市值(打个比方),但是大部分都是政府持有,这些是非流通股,不能买卖的,也就是剔除这部分后,能在市场上自由买卖的中石油的股票只有10亿。那这10亿的流通市值就是free float adjustment,这10亿的流动性肯定比原来的500亿流动性好啊,对吧?但是statement却说 lower its liquidity。所以不对

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 458

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201809170400000201问题如下 Whiof Tong’s statements regarng equity inx benchmarks is (are) correct?A.Only Statement 1B.Only Statement 2C.Both Statement 1 anStatement 2B is correct. The three requirements for inx to become the basis for equity investment strategy are ththe inx (rules base (transparent, an(investable. Buffering makes inx benchmarks more investable (Statement 2) making inx transitions a more graanorrly process.A is incorrebecause basing the inx weight of invisecurity solely on the totnumber of shares outstanng without using a free-floaustment mmake the inx less investable. If a stomarket cexclus shares helfounrs, governments, or other companies, then the remaining shares more accurately reflethe stock’s true liquity. Thus a free-floaustment (Statement 1) to a market inx more accurately reflects its actuliquity (it es not lower its liquity). Many inxes require thinvistocks have floanaverage shares traabove a certain percentage of shares outstanng.排除法做对的,知道buffering有降低调构成的成本的作用,但如何理解buffering使得组合more investable?

2023-11-28 11:12 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000201 Buffering makes inx benchmarks more investable (Statement 2) making inx transitions a more graanorrly process. 对于这句话的理解不够深入,请指点。 在之前听课的理解中,investible仅仅意味着“好买还是不好买”,也就是流动性问题。 而buffering解决的是“减少rebalancing”,也就是降低cost的问题。 这两件事不在一个层面上,为什么buffering能牵扯到investible? 谢谢!

2021-10-24 12:15 2 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000201 把流通盘调整后(剔除),发现可以交易的难度提升了,意思不就是说流动性对于投资者不好了?

2021-08-15 11:19 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201809170400000201 第一句话应该修改成 提高流动性 是不是就对了? 第二句话能帮忙下吗

2021-04-09 14:48 1 · 回答